|
| REDUCING COSTS WITH IMPROVED PART
TRACEABILITY |
Part traceability
has become a critical issue
for manufacturers in all
types of industries. There
is increasing pressure
to implement traceability
systems to reduce errors
and meet the needs of customers
who require that the products
they purchase are marked
to their specifications.
Having
a good mark on your product
improves in-process quality
control, provides cradle-to-grave
traceability, and improves
the appearance of your
part and your brand. Integrated
with readers, verifiers,
and vision systems, marking
systems function as efficient
and vital components of
automated assembly lines.
The
Real Cost of Your Marking
System
Part marking
and tracking, in the overall
scope of a manufacturing
operation, is often overlooked
as an area for improvement.
Even as the need for part
traceability increases,
a surprising number of
manufacturers still use
labor-intensive, error-prone,
manual marking techniques.
Others who were early adopters
of part marking systems
find that the equipment
they installed years ago
is barely keeping pace
with increased production
demands.
Today’s
manufacturers are under
great pressure to produce
the best quality products
possible while maintaining
or reducing costs. While
it may be difficult to
find money in the operating
budget for something like
marking equipment, it is
important to consider the
real cost of ownership
of any marking system.
The consequences
of using equipment that
is outdated or that needs
constant maintenance can
be measured in terms of
lost production, direct
labor, high consumable
costs, and scrap due to
mis-marked product. Then
there are the downstream
costs to consider. If parts
are marked incorrectly
– or not marked at
all – manufacturers
are open to the risks of
production errors, shipping
customers the wrong product,
fraudulent warranty claims,
and losing future business
to competitors.
Improving
product traceability also
allows manufacturers to
pinpoint product defects
more precisely. If products
fail, a manufacturer can
limit its liability on
product recalls, service,
and warranty claims.
Reducing
Costs through Efficiency
When evaluating
manufacturing cells to
identify opportunities
to cut costs and increase
throughput, take a closer
look at the marking and
verification process. There
are several things to consider
when evaluating the efficiency
of the marking operation.
- Amount of
operator intervention
required.
Could the process be
fully automated?
- Equipment
reliability. Does
it need frequent cleaning,
adjusting or maintenance?
- Ease of
mark changeover.
Does production slow
down or stop when the
mark changes, for instance
when switching to a
new color, changing
date or shift codes,
or adjusting the equipment
for marking a different
item?
- Automatic
data capture.
Are you taking advantage
of every opportunity
to integrate your marking
process with your host/ERP
systems?
- Mark quality
and error rates.
How much product needs
to be scrapped or reworked
due to incorrect or
low-quality marks?
Evaluating
the Solutions
Once opportunities
for improvement have been
identified, the search
begins for the most suitable
marking technology for
the application. There
are many types of marking
systems available, from
simple hand-held marking
tools to fully automated
marking, verification,
and data collection systems.
There are many factors
that influence the selection
of the right system, including
the type of material being
marked, the production
speed, the information
being marked, how often
the mark information changes,
the environment where the
equipment must operate,
and the processes and environments
the mark must survive.
Pannier
Corporation, a marking
systems manufacturer since
1899, works with manufacturers
in a wide array of industries
to provide a variety of
solutions. Pannier’s
marking consultants work
with each client to conduct
a thorough marking needs
analysis, during which
several possible solutions
are evaluated and the benefits
of each system are weighed
against the costs.
Pannier
has the ability to provide
turnkey systems for many
marking applications, with
full hardware and software
integration capabilities.
Common marking technologies
are contact printers, ink
jet printers, impact stamping
machines, programmable
dot peen markers, lasers,
and industrial tags and
labels. Each marking method
presents a different set
of advantages and disadvantages.
Let Pannier help you find
the marking solution that’s
right for your application. Call us today at 1-877-PANNIER.
pdf
version
|